Automate security ownership and access checks

Use case assignments, on-call schedules, and admin roles to draft a security responsibility map. Check for gaps when people join, change roles, or leave.

Tools for roles, responsibilities, and authorities

MCP servers for the tools used in these examples.

Automation examples and starter prompts

Paste a prompt into Claude Code, Microsoft Copilot, or Codex connected to Tracecat MCP. Adapt it to your tools and test before deployment. Human tool approvals and advanced case features require Enterprise.

Generate a security RACI from reality

GV.RR-02

Build me a workflow in Tracecat that drafts our security RACI from observed reality. Pull who actually handles cases from Tracecat assignments, who carries the pager from PagerDuty schedules, and who holds admin roles from Okta. Have an AI agent assemble the draft RACI in Notion, flag responsibilities with no named owner, and flag people who hold authority with no documented responsibility. First help me understand how this maps to GV.RR-02 and why a RACI built from real activity beats one written in a workshop. Ask me which security functions to cover first. Talk me through how to handle the gaps the draft exposes without turning the exercise into blame.

Track security workload and resourcing

GV.RR-03

Build me a resourcing report in Tracecat. Each month, measure case volume per analyst, backlog age, after-hours pages from PagerDuty, and the work that sat untouched. Have an AI agent turn the numbers into a short resourcing brief that compares the workload against our documented roles, and post it to the leadership channel. First help me understand how this maps to GV.RR-03 and how workload evidence supports resource allocation arguments. Ask me what headcount and tooling constraints we are working within. Talk me through which trends signal under-resourcing versus process problems.

Wire security into HR lifecycle events

GV.RR-04

Build me an automation in Tracecat that hooks security into HR lifecycle events. On hire, confirm security training is assigned and the right group memberships were granted in Okta. On role change, re-check access against the new role. On exit, verify every account and credential was revoked within the agreed window and open a Linear issue for anything that lingers. First help me understand how this maps to GV.RR-04 and where HR practices usually leak security obligations. Ask me how I get notified of hires, role changes, and exits today. Talk me through which checks should block and which should just report.

NIST CSF 2.0 mapping: GV.RR

Official NIST category: Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities. Cybersecurity roles, responsibilities, and authorities to foster accountability, performance assessment, and continuous improvement are established and communicated

The controls and implementation examples below are NIST source material. The automation prompts above are Tracecat-authored starting points, not evidence of compliance or full control coverage.

GV.RR-01
PM-2
PM-19
PM-23
PM-24
PM-29
Organizational leadership is responsible and accountable for cybersecurity risk and fosters a culture that is risk-aware, ethical, and continually improving
- Leaders (e.g., directors) agree on their roles and responsibilities in developing, implementing, and assessing the organization's cybersecurity strategy
- Share leaders' expectations regarding a secure and ethical culture, especially when current events present the opportunity to highlight positive or negative examples of cybersecurity risk management
- Leaders direct the CISO to maintain a comprehensive cybersecurity risk strategy and review and update it at least annually and after major events
- Conduct reviews to ensure adequate authority and coordination among those responsible for managing cybersecurity risk
GV.RR-02
PM-2
PM-13
PM-19
PM-23
PM-24
PM-29
Roles, responsibilities, and authorities related to cybersecurity risk management are established, communicated, understood, and enforced
- Document risk management roles and responsibilities in policy
- Document who is responsible and accountable for cybersecurity risk management activities and how those teams and individuals are to be consulted and informed
- Include cybersecurity responsibilities and performance requirements in personnel descriptions
- Document performance goals for personnel with cybersecurity risk management responsibilities, and periodically measure performance to identify areas for improvement
- Clearly articulate cybersecurity responsibilities within operations, risk functions, and internal audit functions
GV.RR-03
PM-3
Adequate resources are allocated commensurate with the cybersecurity risk strategy, roles, responsibilities, and policies
- Conduct periodic management reviews to ensure that those given cybersecurity risk management responsibilities have the necessary authority
- Identify resource allocation and investment in line with risk tolerance and response
- Provide adequate and sufficient people, process, and technical resources to support the cybersecurity strategy
GV.RR-04
PM-13
PS-1
PS-7
PS-9
Cybersecurity is included in human resources practices
- Integrate cybersecurity risk management considerations into human resources processes (e.g., personnel screening, onboarding, change notification, offboarding)
- Consider cybersecurity knowledge to be a positive factor in hiring, training, and retention decisions
- Conduct background checks prior to onboarding new personnel for sensitive roles, and periodically repeat background checks for personnel with such roles
- Define and enforce obligations for personnel to be aware of, adhere to, and uphold security policies as they relate to their roles

Control text and SP 800-53 Rev 5 references from the official NIST CSF 2.0 and OLIR releases.

Build your own security automation

Adapt a starter prompt with your coding assistant, choose where AI agents or fixed workflows fit, and test with your tools.

All examples Book a demo