Tracecat
Book a demo
Identify
ID.IM

Turn incident lessons into tracked improvements

Have an AI agent read case records and propose updates to your incident response plan. Turn concrete fixes from incidents and exercises into tickets with owners.

Tools for improvement

MCP servers for the tools used in these examples.

Automation examples and starter prompts

Paste a prompt into Claude Code, Microsoft Copilot, or Codex connected to Tracecat MCP. Adapt it to your tools and test before deployment. Human tool approvals and advanced case features require Enterprise.

Turn case retros into tracked improvements

Build me a case-triggered workflow in Tracecat that runs when a significant case closes. Have an AI agent read the case timeline and comments, extract what slowed the response down and what information was missing, and open a Linear improvement issue for each concrete fix. Post a weekly digest of open improvements and their age to the team channel. First help me understand how this maps to ID.IM-03 and why improvements from daily operations beat annual lessons-learned documents. Ask me which case types deserve a retro. Talk me through keeping the improvement backlog from becoming a graveyard.

Keep the incident response plan current

Build me a quarterly workflow in Tracecat that checks our incident response plan against reality. Have an AI agent read the plan in Notion, compare its steps and contacts against how our last quarter of incidents actually ran in Incident.io, and draft proposed updates: steps nobody follows, contacts who left, and paths real incidents took that the plan never mentions. First help me understand how this maps to ID.IM-04 and what makes response plans drift from practice. Ask me where the plan lives and who owns it. Talk me through whether the agent should propose edits directly or assemble evidence for a human review session.

Mine test and exercise results for fixes

Build me an automation in Tracecat that turns security test results into tracked work. Import findings from pentest reports, purple team exercises, and tabletop notes, dedupe them against known gaps, and open a Jira ticket per new finding with the exercise context attached. Track closure and flag findings that resurface across exercises. First help me understand how this maps to ID.IM-02 and why repeat findings are the signal worth escalating. Ask me what format our test results arrive in. Talk me through involving suppliers when an exercise exposes a gap on their side.

NIST CSF 2.0 mapping: ID.IM

Official NIST category: Improvement. Improvements to organizational cybersecurity risk management processes, procedures and activities are identified across all CSF Functions

The controls and implementation examples below are NIST source material. The automation prompts above are Tracecat-authored starting points, not evidence of compliance or full control coverage.

  • ID.IM-01
    AC-1
    AT-1
    AU-1
    CA-1
    CA-2
    CA-5
    CA-7
    CA-8
    CM-1
    CP-1
    CP-2
    IA-1
    IR-1
    IR-4
    IR-8
    MA-1
    MP-1
    PE-1
    PL-1
    PL-2
    PM-1
    PS-1
    PT-1
    RA-1
    RA-3
    RA-5
    RA-7
    SA-1
    SA-8
    SA-11
    SA-17(6)
    SC-1
    SI-1
    SI-2
    SI-4
    SR-1
    SR-5

    Improvements are identified from evaluations

  • ID.IM-02
    AC-1
    AT-1
    AU-1
    CA-1
    CA-2
    CA-5
    CA-7
    CA-8
    CM-1
    CP-1
    CP-2
    CP-4
    IA-1
    IR-1
    IR-3
    IR-4
    IR-8
    MA-1
    MP-1
    PE-1
    PL-1
    PL-2
    PM-1
    PM-4
    PM-31
    PS-1
    PT-1
    RA-1
    RA-3
    RA-5
    RA-7
    SA-1
    SA-8
    SA-11
    SC-1
    SI-1
    SI-2
    SI-4
    SR-1
    SR-5

    Improvements are identified from security tests and exercises, including those done in coordination with suppliers and relevant third parties

  • ID.IM-03
    AC-1
    AT-1
    AU-1
    CA-1
    CA-2
    CA-5
    CA-7
    CA-8
    CM-1
    CP-1
    CP-2
    IA-1
    IR-1
    IR-4
    IR-8
    MA-1
    MP-1
    PE-1
    PL-1
    PL-2
    PM-1
    PM-4
    PM-31
    PS-1
    PT-1
    RA-1
    RA-3
    RA-5
    RA-7
    SA-1
    SA-4
    SA-8
    SA-11
    SC-1
    SI-1
    SI-2
    SI-4
    SR-1
    SR-5

    Improvements are identified from execution of operational processes, procedures, and activities

  • ID.IM-04
    CP-2
    IR-8
    PL-2
    SR-2

    Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans that affect operations are established, communicated, maintained, and improved

Control text and SP 800-53 Rev 5 references from the official NIST CSF 2.0 and OLIR releases.

Build your own security automation

Adapt a starter prompt with your coding assistant, choose where AI agents or fixed workflows fit, and test with your tools.