Track security commitments and dependencies

Connect customer security promises to the controls behind them. Keep obligations, owners, and critical service dependencies in records your team can review when something changes.

Tools for organizational context

MCP servers for the tools used in these examples.

Automation examples and starter prompts

Paste a prompt into Claude Code, Microsoft Copilot, or Codex connected to Tracecat MCP. Adapt it to your tools and test before deployment. Human tool approvals and advanced case features require Enterprise.

Build a compliance obligations register

GV.OC-03

Build me a compliance obligations register in Tracecat. Create a table of every legal, regulatory, and contractual security requirement we carry, each with its source, owner, and the controls that satisfy it. Seed it from our Vanta frameworks and the security commitments written into customer contracts in Notion. When a mapped control starts failing, open a Linear issue for the owner with the obligation at stake. First help me understand how this maps to GV.OC-03 and why obligations need a register separate from the controls themselves. Ask me which regulations and contract types apply to us. Talk me through whether new-regulation intake should be a scheduled review or an agent that reads compliance news and proposes register entries.

Map critical services and dependencies

GV.OC-04 GV.OC-05

Build me a dependency map in Tracecat. Inventory the services customers depend on us for, and the external services we depend on to deliver them. Pull the SaaS estate from Okta, infrastructure services from AWS, and keep both directions in one table with owner and criticality. Have an AI agent draft the dependency overview in Notion and refresh it when the table changes. First help me understand how this maps to GV.OC-04 and GV.OC-05, and why both directions of dependency matter for risk decisions. Ask me which customer-facing services count as critical. Talk me through how often the map should refresh and what should trigger a review instead of a silent update.

Track customer security commitments

GV.OC-02

Build me a commitments tracker in Tracecat. Collect the security promises we make in customer questionnaires and contracts, record each commitment in a table with the customer, the wording, and the control behind it. When a backing control regresses in Vanta, flag every affected commitment and draft the heads-up email for the account owner in Gmail, held for my approval. First help me understand how this maps to GV.OC-02 and why stakeholder expectations should be tracked as concrete commitments rather than a static document. Ask me where our questionnaire answers live today. Talk me through what the agent should extract automatically versus what needs human reading.

NIST CSF 2.0 mapping: GV.OC

Official NIST category: Organizational Context. The circumstances - mission, stakeholder expectations, dependencies, and legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements - surrounding the organization's cybersecurity risk management decisions are understood

The controls and implementation examples below are NIST source material. The automation prompts above are Tracecat-authored starting points, not evidence of compliance or full control coverage.

GV.OC-01
PM-11
The organizational mission is understood and informs cybersecurity risk management
- Share the organization's mission (e.g., through vision and mission statements, marketing, and service strategies) to provide a basis for identifying risks that may impede that mission
GV.OC-02
PM-9
PM-18
PM-30
SR-3
SR-5
SR-6
SR-8
Internal and external stakeholders are understood, and their needs and expectations regarding cybersecurity risk management are understood and considered
- Identify relevant internal stakeholders and their cybersecurity-related expectations (e.g., performance and risk expectations of officers, directors, and advisors; cultural expectations of employees)
- Identify relevant external stakeholders and their cybersecurity-related expectations (e.g., privacy expectations of customers, business expectations of partnerships, compliance expectations of regulators, ethics expectations of society)
GV.OC-03
AC-1
AT-1
AU-1
CA-1
CM-1
CP-1
IA-1
IR-1
MA-1
MP-1
PE-1
PL-1
PM-1
PM-28
PS-1
PT
PT-1
RA-1
SA-1
SC-1
SI-1
SR-1
Legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements regarding cybersecurity - including privacy and civil liberties obligations - are understood and managed
- Determine a process to track and manage legal and regulatory requirements regarding protection of individuals' information (e.g., Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, California Consumer Privacy Act, General Data Protection Regulation)
- Determine a process to track and manage contractual requirements for cybersecurity management of supplier, customer, and partner information
- Align the organization's cybersecurity strategy with legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements
GV.OC-04
CP-2(8)
PM-8
PM-11
PM-30(1)
RA-9
Critical objectives, capabilities, and services that external stakeholders depend on or expect from the organization are understood and communicated
- Establish criteria for determining the criticality of capabilities and services as viewed by internal and external stakeholders
- Determine (e.g., from a business impact analysis) assets and business operations that are vital to achieving mission objectives and the potential impact of a loss (or partial loss) of such operations
- Establish and communicate resilience objectives (e.g., recovery time objectives) for delivering critical capabilities and services in various operating states (e.g., under attack, during recovery, normal operation)
GV.OC-05
PM-11
PM-30
RA-7
SA-9
SR-5
Outcomes, capabilities, and services that the organization depends on are understood and communicated
- Create an inventory of the organization's dependencies on external resources (e.g., facilities, cloud-based hosting providers) and their relationships to organizational assets and business functions
- Identify and document external dependencies that are potential points of failure for the organization's critical capabilities and services, and share that information with appropriate personnel

Control text and SP 800-53 Rev 5 references from the official NIST CSF 2.0 and OLIR releases.

Build your own security automation

Adapt a starter prompt with your coding assistant, choose where AI agents or fixed workflows fit, and test with your tools.

All examples Book a demo